DOJ Releases MORE Epstein Files — 53 Pages Previously Withheld Include Trump Allegations
The Department of Justice has released 53 pages of previously withheld Jeffrey Epstein files.
These documents were originally coded as “duplicative” and kept from public view.
The release is already sparking reactions:
Justice Department releases Epstein files with uncorroborated Trump accusation – The White House called the allegations “completely baseless” https://t.co/0fZ9GgxgR9
— NBC 15 News (@mynbc15) March 6, 2026
The newly unsealed pages contain allegations involving President Trump.
From Newsmax:
The Department of Justice has released 53 pages of Jeffrey Epstein files that were previously withheld after being incorrectly coded as duplicative. The documents include allegations involving President Trump, though they remain uncorroborated and lack supporting evidence. Republican lawmakers called the release a political stunt aimed at smearing the president, while Democrats claimed it proved a cover-up by prior administrations.
The allegations remain uncorroborated.
No supporting evidence has emerged.
Conservatives see through the smears:
The Justice Dept. has released Jeffrey Epstein files involving uncorroborated accusations by a woman against President Trump that the department said had been mistakenly withheld. https://t.co/Xz3knuUf9c pic.twitter.com/wIFwL8D56E
— CBS News Texas (@CBSNewsTexas) March 8, 2026
From The Daily Wire:
The newly released Epstein documents contain allegations against President Trump that were previously redacted or misfiled. Sources close to the investigation say the claims are uncorroborated hearsay with no new evidence. The release has sparked renewed calls for full transparency, but conservatives warn it is being weaponized by political opponents.
Republican lawmakers slammed the timing.
They called it a political stunt.
The claims are hearsay without evidence.
Democrats cried cover-up anyway.
GOP leaders stood firm.
President Trump is the target of smears.
The truth is emerging:
What’s your conclusion?
